Take the 2-minute tour ×
Board & Card Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people who like playing board games, designing board games or modifying the rules of existing board games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am wondering if any game designers have used an online implementation of a game to balance and tweak it before commercial release.

share|improve this question
1  
Apparently some Dominion cards have been play tested online: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_(card_game)#Online_Play –  tttppp Feb 1 '13 at 11:45
4  
As a software developer, creating an online implementation is many orders of magnitude more difficult than getting a group of people to playtest a physical game. So you'd only do this if you wanted to release the online version simultaneously, which seems like putting the cart before the horse. –  bwarner Feb 1 '13 at 14:56
    
Any designs, or any commercial designs? Are you only interested in rules design changes, or perhaps instruction rewrites, layout changes, etc. for clarity? –  user1873 Feb 1 '13 at 14:57
    
@bwarner you could imagine a kind of "game design funnel", where most games are rejected at a print and play stage. Some promising candidates get turned into an online version for tweaking and balance. The goal isn't just to minimize costs, you also want to produce something of quality. –  rrenaud Feb 1 '13 at 16:10
2  
@rrenaud Imagine a very optimistic budget to create an online implementation of $20,000. Then imagine how many playtest sessions of the physical game that you could get for half that amount. –  bwarner Feb 1 '13 at 16:55
show 2 more comments

5 Answers

up vote 2 down vote accepted

I'm pretty sure "Day and Night" was tested online before release. But the online game was only limited to a small beta testing audience. The website used to say that the online version would reappear at some point, but the website is now dead and the developers appear to have vanished.

Since Day and Night is an asymmetric game, getting the two sides balanced is important, and the developers claimed that they were very close to 50:50 based on online testing.

share|improve this answer
add comment

VASSAL offers a way to create on online version of a game easily. I was involved in play testing Crown of Roses using a VASSAL module. The map for Clash of Monarchs has been critised as being difficult to use and the reason provided for this was that most of the play testing was done online which had a much clearer map.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Donald X. Vaccarino, the designer of Dominion, tested it with a program he wrote himself. Later expansions were playtested in a private room of the Isotropic online Dominion server. He discusses it briefly here:

I did not know Doug prior to him making isotropic; Wei-Hwa knew him. Before isotropic, I used a DOS program I wrote in Pascal, cbtest. It didn't do the internet part, we handled that via irc.

(Doug is dougz, the creator of the now-unavailable Isotropic Dominion.)

share|improve this answer
add comment

A significant proportion of wargames released these days (e.g., by GMT) is playtested using VASSAL.

share|improve this answer
add comment

I was a beta tester for a few of David Sirlin's card games. Most of the beta testing was done online, in a combination of LackeyCCG and a very rough alpha web client for Yomi. I actually put some footage up on YouTube.

Someone brought up the objection that writing an online client is much harder than just designing the game. While it's true to an extent, you can cut a lot of corners if you're just testing. You don't need a lot of flair, or rules enforcement, or even "something that isn't dog-ugly", and your early testers won't care because it's not a finished game anyway.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.