Take the 2-minute tour ×
Board & Card Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people who like playing board games, designing board games or modifying the rules of existing board games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I play Go online and have by now quite a few sgf's of past games available which I could review. I'm however lazy so I certainly wont review all or even most of them. So which ones can I learn the most from reviewing? Ones against stronger players or against weaker ones? The ones I lost or the ones I won?

share|improve this question
add comment

closed as primarily opinion-based by BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft, Johno, Lance Roberts, Patters, LittleBobbyTables Oct 21 '13 at 13:12

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

2 Answers

up vote 1 down vote accepted

TimK highlighted the most important aspects already. I would put some additional emphasis on two things:

First, games which featured a shape that was of particular interest to you. Maybe some unusual corner sequence? Or a tsumego that went really strange in the game? Have a look. This even applies to blitz games.

Secondly, games in which you do not know why you lost

Those are particularly interesting. After fuseki (for instance), you honestly think you did okay, but the game has a bad feeling to it, and you notice how your opponent has so many nice moves available, while you somehow see no good moves for yourself! How could this happen?

Typically, these games show a flaw in your internal thought process and basic understanding of the game. Review those with a (much) stronger player. Now two things can happen.

Either his ideas will hit you and you suddenly get it. That's nice, you should remember the issue he explained.

Or, you will regard his advice as only so-so, not bad but also not particularly good - and this shows exactly what is wrong with your thought process. It means you lack correct judgement in a particular area. Try to grasp his ideas and appreciate them until you incorporate them in your thought process. This means your general understanding of the game will increase, which is the topmost important obstacle when you 'hit a wall' in improving.

share|improve this answer
add comment

You should review games where you really put some thought into your moves. If you play a quick game without thinking much, the mistakes you find will just be oversights and carelessness. If you review games you've spent some time on, or better yet have a stronger player review them, then the mistakes are more likely to be real holes in your knowledge, or moves that were smaller than you thought.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.