Take the 2-minute tour ×
Board & Card Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people who like playing board games, designing board games or modifying the rules of existing board games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The rules say that the game is for 2 to 8 players. But there are only eight monopolies on the board, meaning that in a game of eight players, there would only be an average of one monopoly for each player. Meaning that some players probably would have no monopolies. And it might be hard for any player to get a monopoly (except, possibly, by trading). Then you would have a great divide between the propertied, and non-propertied players.

My own experience has been that the best games have been between two or three people and that it can probably accommodate four or five. Has anyone experienced an interesting, enjoyable, challenging game with six to eight players? Or has it gone the other way with "too many cooks spoiling the broth?"

In the interest of keeping answers relatively objective, please answer this question based on experiences, that is games that you have actually played, or at least observed. If you want to cite a book or study discussing based on the author's experiences (either first hand or computer simulated) that would also be fine.

share|improve this question
I have found more than 0 to be "too many players" for Monopoly. –  GendoIkari Jan 31 '14 at 14:35
@GendoIkari: Based on what experiences you've had with the game? The question asked you to relate your relevant experiences. –  Tom Au Jan 31 '14 at 14:36
It's just personal opinion; based on the types of games I like. It wasn't meant as an answer to the question, just a quip. –  GendoIkari Jan 31 '14 at 14:49

3 Answers 3

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Board Game Geek has some session reports for Monopoly.

The main problem with having more players is that starting order becomes increasingly important as you add more players. If you're going 6th, 7th or 8th then your chances of landing on an unowned property are very low. You're pretty much screwed from the start.

share|improve this answer
Which basically depends on the first dice roll, prior to the game. –  Tom Au Feb 1 '14 at 22:18
This is exactly right. I've played in a game with 7 players and three of the first four players were clearly in the lead the whole way through. Players 6 and 7 struggled to buy anything –  dsas Feb 2 '14 at 0:22
@dsas: Based on your experiences, four players is manageable, maybe five, but 6 and 7 are going to suffer. –  Tom Au Feb 2 '14 at 14:40
One solution is that people cannot purchase property until they go around the board once. That further randomizes the effect of who has the first go at buying property. –  Jason Feb 4 '14 at 10:06

There are two ways of playing Monopoly: I find them considerably more different than, say, Chess and Draughts.

The first is the commoner, a family game played to fill in the hours till bedtime. Everybody knows that Emily will cry if she loses, so the Bank provides regular subsidies. If there are no losers, there can be no winners, so the aim becomes 'to build up a pretty-looking property portfolio': if the supply of houses and hotels runs out, something else is used instead. This is pretty much a game for the feebleminded, and with more than five players there are not enough properties for everybody.

The second is played among adults, with no house rules. Being a simulation of unbridled capitalism, the aim is to bankrupt your competition. So you don't trade another player the card to make up a monopoly unless a) you get a monopoly, or something equally valuable, in return or b) you think the other player is overstretched: for example, if he has to pay rent before somebody pays him, he will have to mortgage the newly acquired monopoly, losing the right to build houses, and starting on a downward spiral. This can certainly be played with eight players, though the tactics change drastically as the number of players goes up, and you will probably lose the first time you play an x-player game.

Forgoing any political comparisons, I remark only that it is strange that the players who object to Monopoly as a children's game that never finishes are usually the ones who insist on altering the rules to make it less painful, which means it lasts longer and your decisions are less important.

share|improve this answer
I'd say that with more than 4, there is no tactic, just luck. Much more than with less players. –  PatomaS Feb 2 '14 at 11:29
@PatomaS: Good point. –  Tom Au Feb 2 '14 at 14:42

With less players, everyone gets a few monopolies, and then it's just the luck of who lands on the other's monopoly first. With more players, it's about who can strike a deal, take risks, and strategize the best. A good way to break the first rollers advantage is implementing the house rule that one must go around the board once before buying a property

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.