Board & Card Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people who like playing board games, designing board games or modifying the rules of existing board games. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a few Magic: The Gathering cards whose editions I'm having trouble identifying. They are obviously from either Alpha or Beta, since they have black borders and the same design as the Unlimited edition, but how can I distinguish between both editions?

share|improve this question
up vote 41 down vote accepted

ALPHA cards are black bordered and have very very rounded edges ( 2mm radius ) compared to all other kinds of magic cards ( 1mm radius ). Just pick up a black bordered card and overlay them on top of each other. If the corners are VERY different then you have ALPHA, otherwise you have BETA.

There are several cards that were corrected between alpha and beta and can be used to instantly identify extremely worn cards. As cited on Wikipedia

  • Circle of Protection: Black was accidentally omitted from Alpha.
  • Cyclopean Tomb had no casting cost, instead of a casting cost of 4.
  • Death Ward incorrectly credited Dan Frazier as the artist rather than Mark Poole.
  • Elvish Archers had its power/toughness listed as 1/2 rather than 2/1.
  • Force of Nature was printed with the letter G in its text box rather than the green mana symbol, and the artist's name was spelled incorrectly.
  • Orcish Artillery had a casting cost of 1R rather than 1RR.
  • Orcish Oriflamme had a casting cost of 1R rather than 3R.
  • Phantasmal Forces was printed with the letter U in its text box rather than the blue mana symbol.
  • Red Elemental Blast was printed as an instant rather than an interrupt, making half of its ability unplayable under the rules of the time.
  • Sedge Troll incorrectly credited Jeff A. Menges as the artist rather than Dan Frazier.
  • Volcanic Island was accidentally omitted from Alpha.

One set that recently came to my attention that is not identified on the chart is called "Alternate 4th Edition".

From sgcardgames on eBay:

  1. This set is only available in starter decks. Their ISBN is 1-880992-26-4 instead of 1-880992-25-6.

  2. The back of the Alternate Forth Edition cards feel glossy, very much different from normal Magic Cards.

  3. Alternate Forth Edition cards do not glow under ultraviolet light, while normal cards do.

  4. Alternate Forth Edition cards have a darker blue colour at the top of the letter A from the word MAGIC while normal cards have a light blue colour.

This Magic Set Identifier flowchart will help you with any other sets up to about 2001, beyond there it's fairly easy to identify from the set symbol on the card. Thanks to Hackworth for providing an up to date url for it!

Magic Set Identifier flowchart

share|improve this answer
Graph seems rather unhinged. – Drunk Cynic May 14 at 2:52
@DrunkCynic ... Feel free to update the answer with a neater one. – Stephen May 14 at 3:37
Was a cheeky reference to Un-hinged. – Drunk Cynic May 14 at 4:57
@DrunkCynic I rather thought it might be but the humour didn't really translate I guess. Cheers! – Stephen May 14 at 11:59
Does this graph apply to non-English cards? – John Jun 6 at 15:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.