3,482 reputation
726
bio website
location
age
visits member for 3 years, 11 months
seen 1 hour ago

Math.SE seems to be going the stackoverflow way. Pity.


Jan
21
comment Why is this type of hesitation considered unethical?
@CashCow: Right, you can cash the second round. Say it was four tricks needed with AKQ9 opposite xx or something. btw, well done on the Q play (haven't heard of Dick Shek, sorry).
Jan
19
awarded  Enlightened
Jan
19
awarded  Nice Answer
Jan
14
awarded  Nice Answer
Jan
12
revised Why is there a bonus for holding honors in bridge? Isn't having 4-5 of the highest trumps privileges enough?
added 32 characters in body
Jan
10
comment Why is there a bonus for holding honors in bridge? Isn't having 4-5 of the highest trumps privileges enough?
@SimonRose: Perhaps you need to play more rubber bridge :-). btw, your arguments can also be applied to someone getting 15+ points or whatever. In rubber bridge luck plays a factor. You cannot deny that. That is why I prefer duplicate.
Jan
8
comment Why is there a bonus for holding honors in bridge? Isn't having 4-5 of the highest trumps privileges enough?
@SimonRose: It will even out, solely because it adds to the top of the line. Think of it as a side bet, made every time a rubber is played.
Jan
2
revised Defense to Strong Pass Systems
edited tags
Dec
20
revised duplicate bridge revoke not agreed upon
Wall of text. Try to make paragraphs and the play more readable.
Sep
30
awarded  Explainer
Sep
24
awarded  Autobiographer
Sep
24
comment Are there hands that should be opened at the one level in first or second seat, and with a “weak two” opposite a passing partner?
@CashCow: Did you mean Pieter? I only gave one hand, and that too missing the partner's cards...
Aug
14
comment In bridge, are the two “equal vulnerabilities” basically equal?
@TomAu: The doubling is for when your side has the majority of strength and they have sacrificed at the 3 level, and at matchpoints, -140 might be as bad as -730 (they make doubled) or +100 (they go down 1), when most other tables are going +140. You double to convert the +100 into +200, beating most other tables in +140. Basically doubling has little to lose (-140 to -730 will be similar score), but a lot to gain (+100 to +200). Of course, this assumes +140 at other tables. Here is an interesting article you might like: bridgewinners.com/article/view/matchpoints-do-i-need-to-double
Aug
14
comment Why is this type of hesitation considered unethical?
@Kevin: That is why they advise you to take your time at trick 1. You are entitled to do some thinking upfront. Once you gain more information mid-hand, you can always pause to think about the whole hand. Some people recommend playing a card face down in normal tempo, and doing the thinking, saying "thinking about the hand". You don't have to coffee-house, and you won't be hanged, and as a side effect, planning ahead will improve your results!
Aug
14
comment Why is this type of hesitation considered unethical?
@KevinDriscoll: Nope. Falsecards don't put garbage in the pool. For instance, AKQ9x opposite xxx. You need to make 5 tricks from the suite. You play a low card to the A. RHO follows with the J. If RHO is a weak defender you finesse the 9 the next round (restricted choice), but if RHO is a good defender you should consider the play for the drop. Consider the same situation where RHO thinks for a while and follows the J. Ultimately he turns out to have a singleton J (where he had no reason to be thinking).
Aug
14
answered In bridge, are the two “equal vulnerabilities” basically equal?
Aug
12
comment Are there hands that should be opened at the one level in first or second seat, and with a “weak two” opposite a passing partner?
@PieterGeerkens: Sorry, I don't buy that game would be reached, especially with the auction you gave (playing some form of 2/1). But that is irrelevant. Hands which have a very low expectation of making a game (but a good expectation of making 2M) opposite a passed hand can be opened 2M (third or fourth seat), whether they are sub-minimum or stronger than minimum. I don't see any problems (at least those that I can't live with). Perhaps the example I gave is not right, but as I said, that is irrelevant. The main point is that there are 1M openers in 1st/2nd which could be opened 2M in 3rd/4th.
Aug
12
comment Are there hands that should be opened at the one level in first or second seat, and with a “weak two” opposite a passing partner?
@PieterGeerkens: Say you open 1S. With xxx, xxxx, AKxxx, x, you would only get to game if responder decides to invite. Yes? Similar situation with the second hand, isn't it? Stop giving partner the perfect hands, then we can have a discussion :-) Note, the question was about opening 2S in 3rd or 4th only. In 1st and 2nd you open 1S.
Aug
11
comment Are there hands that should be opened at the one level in first or second seat, and with a “weak two” opposite a passing partner?
Sure, many people would open AKJTxx, x, QJx, xxx in first/second seat, and might choose to bid 2S in third and fourth seats. Fantunes bid 2 of major on 5 (or more) cards and distributional hands, but not as a weak two.
Aug
4
comment Are there times when a hand with a seven card suit is too strong for a three level pre-empt?
@TomAu: I would say good luck with that :-)