Reputation
9,314
Next tag badge:
65/100 score
38/20 answers
Badges
3 25 73
Impact
~394k people reached

Sep
14
comment Creative handicaps in Settlers of Catan?
A handicap restricting the number of cities and settlements would hurt less skilled players because they wouldn't know how to get the 10-point win under the new rules. (Unless the idea is to get a lot of drawn games.) It should go the other way, 6 cities and 5 settlements, giving newbies more chances to win by getting lucky.
Sep
14
comment Are there good two player rules for resource trading in Settlers of Catan?
"I cut and you choose."
Sep
10
comment How do I bid using “weak Stayman” (or garbage stayman)
@Aryabhata: Does "garbage Stayman" refer to the garbage in the hand? Or is it a pejorative reference to the system?
Sep
9
comment How do I bid using “weak Stayman” (or garbage stayman)
@Aryabhata: Then my example above was OK, five diamonds, four spades, three hearts, one club. Because you need 3-3-5-2 (or better) right?
Sep
9
comment How do I bid using “weak Stayman” (or garbage stayman)
@Aryabhata: Would you bid 2 diamonds (Jacoby transfer) with a Yarborough and six hearts? Does weak Stayman operate on the same principle?
Sep
9
comment How do I bid using “weak Stayman” (or garbage stayman)
let us continue this discussion in chat
Sep
9
comment How do I bid using “weak Stayman” (or garbage stayman)
Not "obtuseness." The argument against weak Stayman is that you would gain a similar (or only slightly better) result than passing with proper use, and you could do worse with IMproper use.
Sep
9
comment How do I bid using “weak Stayman” (or garbage stayman)
Regarding -500 or -800; 1NT with 15 HCP and nothing in dummy stands to make four tricks, down three. Just an "occupational hazard" for this rare event. With two of a seven card suit, about the same. But two of an eight card suit, more like down two. "Damage control."
Sep
9
comment How do I bid using “weak Stayman” (or garbage stayman)
Your answer clears up this issue.
Sep
3
comment What is the “shuck-shuck” strategy?
@quinestor: "Guaranteed" as by Don Raw. Which is why I put it in quotation marks.
Aug
28
comment In bridge, how much support do you need to raise a responder?
@ruds: OK, changed "strength" to "support."
Aug
28
comment Why Do People Use “Precision” Bidding in Bridge?
@ruds: I was taught to play bridge in the 1960s by a teacher born in 1896. Played most of my bridge before 1973. That explains my "old fashioned way of looking at things."
Jun
16
comment Does one need to bid Stayman with a flat distribution?
@ruds: Fixed, only 3 diamonds.
May
22
comment Is there a Diplomacy variant that does not contain stalemate lines?
@tttppp: All OTHER things being equal, what you said is true. But one more supply center makes it easier to get "18 out of 35" than "18 out of 34" because 35 is an odd number.
May
22
comment Can people win at Diplomacy using a “Qin strategy?”
It's close enough. "Qin" preached a particular strategy but didn't follow it dogmatically. And that's probably the key.
May
22
comment What is the point in disclosure of the bidding system to opponents?
@Jefromi: Your question has been more or less asked and answered here: boardgames.stackexchange.com/questions/522/…. Basically, any system is legal as long as you disclose it. So to answer the question, disclosing "legitimizes" a system.
May
22
comment What is the point in disclosure of the bidding system to opponents?
@qble: In chess, you can SEE everything. Whether you "understand" it or not is up to you. In bridge, opponents are supposed to be able to "hear" everything, and not in Swahili either, as Monica pointed out. But of course, you hope that they don't fully understand.
May
15
comment Is there a viable “Japan First” strategy for the Allies in Axis and Allies?
@PaulMarshall:One of the preconditions for this strategy was that "Japan" is a better player than "Germany." Meaning that as an Ally, I'm less concerned about what Germany can do in Africa than about what Japan could do against Russia if not "ganged up" on in this way. Switch the relative strengths and I would NOT use this strategy.
May
15
comment Can people win at Diplomacy using a “Qin strategy?”
@bwarner: It worked in "real life," which is why I asked if it might work in Diplomacy. But the connection might be hard to make on a gameboard.
May
15
comment Can people win at Diplomacy using a “Qin strategy?”
@NIck: 4 vs. 3. That's why the Qin won with it. But it is a sophisticated, complicated strategy fraught with pitfalls. Which is why the Qin made a name for themselves when it worked for them. I believe that's how CHINA got its name.