In our family, we've always interpreted the rules as paying to the bank. We had friends over who had played by Warlord paying to the player whose buildings they got destroyed. To us, it seems like the latter weakened the Warlord special ability quite significantly. I could not find an FAQ that would explain where the money goes.

  • 1
    My understanding of the rules is that the warlord pays to the bank
    – user30903
    Commented Apr 5, 2015 at 3:31
  • One of those friends that we had over was German (uh-oh), and she checked that the German rules she found at home clearly stated that the money is paid to the bank.
    – StasK
    Commented Apr 7, 2015 at 14:55

1 Answer 1


I have two reasons to conclude you pay to the bank:

  1. The rulebook doesn't say that you have to pay to the bank when building a district. This is assumed because it wouldn't make sense otherwise. Similarly, if the rulebook doesn't say whom to pay to destroy, then I assume it must go to the bank.

  2. The warlord can destroy one of it's own district if he wants to replace it. The warlord still has to pay the amount, which then obviously would not go to himself but to the bank.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .