12

Is it possible to position all chess pieces on the board such that all pieces defend at least one piece and attack at least one piece?

  • -1 Irrelevant to play. – aramis May 8 '11 at 7:25
  • When you say "pieces," do you mean just the pieces, or the pawns as well? – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft May 8 '11 at 16:25
  • I mean the pawns as well. I think doing it that way makes it more interesting and complicated... :P – El'endia Starman May 8 '11 at 17:40
  • This reminds me of a computer problem, How do place X (I forgot the number) queens on the board so they don't "attack" each other? – Tom Au Jun 9 '11 at 20:59
  • @Tom: Perhaps you're thinking of this one? math.utah.edu/~alfeld/queens/queens.html – El'endia Starman Jun 9 '11 at 21:20
19

Yes, and it's not particularly hard to do. Here's one solution.

enter image description here

I found this by placing the pawns first (because they are much more limited in their attack/defence potential), and then adding the pieces one at a time. Using this simple manual approach, it took about 15 minutes to find a solution. As an added constraint, I avoided placing the kings in check.

There are undoubtedly many alternative arrangements that would also work. It would be quite straightforward to write a computer program to search for valid configurations. A simple brute-force backtracking algorithm would probably suffice.

0

It cannot be done "naturally" in a normal chess game though.

The pawns on columns A and H only have 1 square of influence for attacking/defending, since they are on the edge of the board. To move them further into the board, they would have to capture another piece, and if you do, you don't have all the pieces on the board anymore.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.