If a character is moved from one location to another via an event (e.g., Airlift) or character ability (e.g., the Administrator ability, which lets you move a pawn to a location with another pawn), does that count as the character leaving the location?

Spoiler pertains to the Cairo recon, and provides context:

With the introduction of the Hollow Men, a character gets exposed when leaving a location that contains 1 or more Hollow Men figures. Does that happen only when doing any of the normal movement actions (Drive/Ferry, Sail, Charter Boat) or any time you are no longer in the location with Hollow Men?


It isn't specifically limited to the movement actions, so anything that causes your pawn to no longer be in that location would count, including events or character abilities. You do have the option to simply stay in that location and perform non-movement actions, which can be viable towards the end of the game if you're about to win or lose anyway.

I asked the same question on BGG, and while there aren't any "official" answers, all of the posts so far have agreed with the conclusion that there are no exceptions.

  • Do you have a source for this? Your interpretation is valid, but saying that "being removed" is not the same as "you leaving" seems equally valid. – João Mendes Nov 5 '18 at 13:59
  • If they wanted to limit it to when you used a movement action from that city, why not just word it that way? It takes some serious linguistic gymnastics to interpret it other ways. There are fewer pawns, therefore a pawn has left. Whose pawn left? Yours did. Therefore "your pawn left". – bwarner Nov 6 '18 at 13:48
  • Like I said, I think your interpretation is valid. It's just that "there are fewer pawns, therefore a pawn has left" or was removed, and I happen to think that this interpretation is equally valid (not more valid), and there doesn't seem to be an official source for this. – João Mendes Nov 6 '18 at 13:57
  • Its your game, you can play it how you want. But considering "removed" an exception to "leaves" while not considering "moved" an exception to "leaves" seems undefendable as an interpretation of rules as written to me. I asked on BGG to see if we could get an official response. – bwarner Nov 6 '18 at 14:22
  • "I asked on BGG to see if we could get an official response." Nice. I'd ask that you add a link to the BGG thread to your answer, and that way we can follow along. – João Mendes Nov 6 '18 at 14:56

We ran into this just last night. We decided that it didn't, for two reasons:

  1. The relevant rule specifically states "when your pawn leaves", and this has an active quality to it, yielding the reasonable interpretation that being moved by someone/something else is not the same as you leaving;
  2. Playing like this gives you options, with inherent opportunity costs, which makes the game strategy richer, whereas disallowing it leaves you with only two bad options (stay still or take the consequence) to respond to something which is completely out of player control, which makes the game strategy poorer.

That said, I couldn't find any source to support this position, or the opposite position, for that matter.

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.