Do you have to have the destination card in your hand to claim that specific route? Or can you claim it without having the destination card?
-
4The wording of your question is unclear. The use of "the destination card" implies you think there is a single specific card, and "claim the destination" implies that you are talking about claiming the points for the destination card (which goes between nonadjacent cities), rather than claiming a route between adjacent cities.– AcccumulationJan 2, 2019 at 18:06
1 Answer
You can claim any unoccupied route between any two locations (that does not require passing through a third location) at any time. You do not require a destination ticket showing either location, and it doesn't have to be connected to any of your other routes. You only need:
- Sufficient trains to cover the route.
- Sufficient cards to pay for it.
- You don't already control the other route between the same locations.
- No other player controls the other route between the same locations in [2-3 players only].*
* Note that the number of players that restrict the use of additional routes varies between versions of Ticket to Ride. For example, extra routes are only blocked in 2-player games of Ticket to Ride: New York and Switzerland.
-
4+1, with one exception. In 2- or 3-player games, routes with two tracks (e.g., NY to Boston) can only have a single player claim them, even though there are two routes available.– mmathisJan 2, 2019 at 0:42
-
1One other exception is that you can't claim both of the routes if they are in play– StyxsksuJan 2, 2019 at 14:45
-
@Styxsksu edited in. It's amazing how quickly the corner cases add up.– JontiaJan 2, 2019 at 15:00
-
4But we all know player who would take advantage of the corner cases if they were not spelled out in the rules.– StyxsksuJan 2, 2019 at 15:04
-
I don't understand how they expect the game to work without it, routes are not one city to the next city over, so no route card would let you play a route in this scenario ever.– AndrewMar 8, 2019 at 14:56