So, I am making a Magic: The Gathering cat deck for my younger sister, and I am running in to a wall with trying to narrow my 63 card deck into a 60 card deck. My biggest problem is that I have 6 really awesome planeswalkers to choose from. They are pairs of three different types of planeswalkers. 6 planeswalkers is quite a lot for a deck. 4 seems decent.

There are two options I have: Get rid of one pair, (as well as another card,) or have each type of planeswalkers, but only one of them. BUT, you can only have one legendary card of the exact same name on the field at the same time.

So, my big question: For legendary cards that you can only have one of on the field at a time, is it usually better to have two types of the same card, and increase your probability of picking it up, but at the risk it taking up space in your hand, and being unable to play it because it's already on the field,


Have different types of legendary cards, meaning you could have both on the field at the same time, but it decreases your chance of picking up either one of the card, making it more unpredictable?

Note: I do not expect people to help me pick cards to put into her deck. That’s not what I want the focus of this question to be about. But I would still gladly listen to any card suggestions. ^^

I will provide card context into the comments below for anyone who desires to help me on my quest to make an awesome cat deck for my sister.

I'm not 100% sure this question is suitable for this site, so just tell me if you feel otherwise.

My deck list is:

  • Isaac, did you mean Leonin Warleader or Leonin Warlord
    – Malco
    Commented Jan 21, 2019 at 15:00
  • 1
    One more thing, based on your mana curve (goes up to 5 mana) and game plan (proactive aggressive strategy), 27 lands is too many. I would start with 25. You only listed basic lands however, which is very dubious and means you almost certainly cannot afford cards like Pride Sovereign since you won't have the mana to cast them. Do you have any dual lands like Temple Garden or Sunpetal Grove? If so, you definitely want to use them.
    – Allure
    Commented Jan 21, 2019 at 19:30
  • Mm. I haven't got many doubles lands at the moment, but I'm planning on getting some.
    – Isaac
    Commented Jan 21, 2019 at 23:50

3 Answers 3


It depends on what you want out of your legends. Sometimes the legend is so important for your deck that you're willing to risk drawing multiples of them. Other times the legend drawback is real, and you don't run four copies for exactly this reason. Some examples from recent Standard:

Adrian Sullivan's Jeskai Control won GP Milwaukee. Note the 4x Niv-Mizzet, Parun. This is a legend, but he has four copies. Why? Lots of factors go into this.

  • Niv-Mizzet is a fantastic win condition: if you ever untap with him, you've more or less won the game (he's even more powerful than Teferi in this regard).
  • Because Niv-Mizzet is so good at winning the game, Adrian Sullivan is dedicating other cards to supporting him - note he has Dive Down to protect Niv-Mizzet from targeted removal, and Treasure Map to accelerate Niv-Mizzet onto the battlefield. These cards (especially Dive Down) are not nearly as good if the deck doesn't draw Niv-Mizzet.
  • Another way of thinking about this is that, this deck wants to draw Niv-Mizzet every single game, and the obvious way to maximize that chance is to run four copies.

Ari Lax's Selesnya tokens from Pro Tour Guilds of Ravnica. Note he has only three copies of Emmara, Soul of the Accord. Why? Again, many factors go into this:

  • Emmara is a great role-player and a great body to Convoke with, but you don't need to draw Emmara. The turn after you play Emmara, you're still only convoking for one mana. If you didn't draw Emmara, you might have drawn another of the deck's 2-drops, which also convoke for the same amount. All your lose out on then is a 1/1 token - still a loss, but not a devastating one. Meanwhile if you draw Emmara without drawing a convoke card, she's not particularly good - just a 2-mana 2/2, easily prevented from attacking.
  • Emmara is easily answered. Shock kill her at mana advantage (Shock costs 1 mana, Emmara costs 2). She's also fully vulnerable to all the commonly-played sweepers, from Ritual of Soot to Deafening Clarion.
  • Emmara is not nearly as threatening as Niv-Mizzet. Niv-Mizzet is a removal magnet: it's fine if you can't play any more Niv-Mizzets, since if you stick a copy of him, you win. With Emmara, if she lives, the game still goes on. In this case any more copies of Emmara in hand become genuine dead cards.

If you followed this, it should be clear why there're only three copies of Emmara in the Selesnya deck. The first copy of Emmara is great, but the second is not. But for the Jeskai deck, casting and protecting Niv-Mizzet is its gameplan. It wants to draw a Niv-Mizzet every game. It doesn't want to draw multiples, but if the first copy dies, it immediately wants to draw another. So it runs four copies of the legend.

Hall of Famer Frank Karsten once wrote an article on how many copies of a card one should include in a deck. He suggests the heuristic:

4 copies – You want to draw the card as often and as early as possible. The card is essential for the deck to work as it's supposed to, and you don't mind drawing multiples, even in your opening hand. You might even be happy to do so. It's rare to play legends as 4-ofs, but you can make exceptions for cards that are extremely powerful and/or removal magnets. Example: Heart of Kiran in Mardu Vehicles or Karn Liberated in Modern Tron.

3 copies – You want to see the card at some point in the midgame, but you prefer not to draw multiples. A second copy is not necessarily dead, but it's much less valuable than the first. Most commonly, this is because the card is expensive to cast, a situational answer, and/or a non-essential legendary. Example: Kari Zev, Skyship Raider in Mono-Red Aggro or Teferi, Hero of Dominaria in U/W Control.

2 copies – You're not excited to see the card in your opening hand, and it's not vital to your strategy. Often, the card is not much better than the alternatives, worthless in multiples, and/or crazy expensive to cast. Example: Josu Vess, Lich Knight in Mono-Black Control or Ugin, the Spirit Dragon in Modern Tron.

1 copy – You don't want to draw the card naturally, but you want to have access to one in your deck. Most commonly, this is because it's a kill condition for strategies that see their entire deck, because you hope to mislead your opponent into thinking you're playing more copies than you actually are, or because it's a tutor target in a toolbox-style deck. For example: Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite in Gifts Ungiven decks or Shalai, Voice of Plenty in Chord of Calling decks.

On a side note: it sounds like you're including planeswalkers because they're "cool". There's nothing wrong with that, but if your aim is to make a strong deck aimed at winning, each card must have a reason for being included. Take Huatli, Radiant Champion. What does this card do for you? Does it make cats? Does it synergize with cats? Is it better than simply casting another creature like Brimaz? I'm pretty sure the answer to all these questions is "no", and so you should not be including her. There's a place for planeswalkers like Huatli, but in a deck like yours, that place is the sideboard. If you're playing against a deck with lots of Cleansing Nova and Golden Demise, then you bring her in because she's a threat that survives these sweepers. But in game 1, when many decks don't have sweepers, you're better off just casting another creature. Among the planeswalkers you listed, the only one I can see playing in the maindeck is Ajani.

  • 1
    Also, thanks for the link. I didn't know professional decks did 1 or 3 cards of a type in a deck, because most decks I've seen have had either 2 or 4 of a card.
    – Isaac
    Commented Jan 21, 2019 at 10:10
  • 1
    I could see both of Huatli's - abilities being of use to the deck, for draw power and combat power when you have a lot of tokens. I don't think the deck needs it at all, but I could see it.
    – Andrew
    Commented Jan 21, 2019 at 14:59
  • 1
    @Andrew the first two of Huatli's abilities are win-more. You need creatures already in play before they're effective, and she's completely unplayable if you're behind on the board. Her ultimate is good of course, but one can never count on activating an ultimate. I can only see her in this deck if one specifically needs a planeswalker (because she survives the sweepers), and even then, Ajani is probably the superior planeswalker.
    – Allure
    Commented Jan 21, 2019 at 18:41
  • I never planned on using Huatilis second ability. But if you have enough cards on the field, on the turn after being played for 4 mana (dirt cheap) I can draw every time a creature or token creature comes out on my side of the field. Since a ton the cat cards work well if there are more of them on the field at the same time, I thought Huatili would be good for pumping those cats out quickly.
    – Isaac
    Commented Jan 21, 2019 at 23:58
  • 1
    @Isaac to be able to use the first ability and then immediately threaten the ultimate is the best case scenario, yeah, but even if the field is safe enough for you to do this (an assumption that's untrue a lot of the time), it doesn't mean you can ultimate. Some cards will kill planeswalkers (e.g. Hero's Downfall, Vraska's Contempt), and it's also possible the opponent can attack through. In particular, all the creatures in the deck are grounded, so you can't block a flying creature.
    – Allure
    Commented Jan 22, 2019 at 0:24

Generally, consistency is preferrable over uniqueness/playability of legendaries.

If you tune a deck for strength, you identify the best cards for your strategy and make sure you draw them when you need them, i.e. rather earlier than later. If your deck has strong card draw or search effects, you can get away with including fewer than 4 of those cards. Otherwise, you want to include as many as possible. Also remember that a planeswalker is a permanent that can be destroyed, countered, discarded, exiled etc., so you will want a replacement ready.

Of course, all this advice depends on your deck, the decks it's playing against, and especially in your case, "flavor" of the deck.


Randomly draw seven cards from your current deck of cards. Do this several times over and over again. Out of that snapshot of 7 cards, decide which ones you absolutely love seeing.

Eliminate the cards you are unsure of or put them in your sideboard.

Play 200 games with someone you trust without changing the matrix of the deck. After putting 200 games behind that setup, decide which cards you love seeing and which ones simply don't make sense.

  • 3
    There is no way "play 200 games with someone you trust" is realistic except for professional tournament players with a support team. This is just someone making a deck for their sibling. Could you suggest something more viable for everyday players? Commented Jan 21, 2019 at 14:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .