-1

Been playing Arena in MTG and it seems to allow casting of spells after resolution on the stack. This does not seem to follow the rules as written. Which is right.

For example three spells are on the stack and both people pass. the first one resolves and you are allowed to continue casting and add to the stack even though you had already begun resolving.

  • 5
    Could you edit your question to include more details? After a spell or ability resolves, a player may of course cast another spell. – Glorfindel Nov 28 '19 at 13:43
4

Allowing casting after resolution is according to rules as written. The relevant rules are 117.1a for when a player can cast a spell, and 117.3b which states that the active player get priority after spell resolution.

117.1a A player may cast an instant spell any time they have priority. A player may cast a noninstant spell during their main phase any time they have priority and the stack is empty.

117.3b The active player receives priority after a spell or ability (other than a mana ability) resolves.

So all players can cast add instants to the stack after the resolution of any spell or ability, although no non-instant can be cast until the stack is empty.

| improve this answer | |
1

Yes, you can always cast spells after something on the stack resolves.

It seems as though your interpretation is that players add to the stack until they're done, and then the entire stack resolves from top to bottom until it's empty in one uninterruptible procedure. But that's not how it goes; there is no unstoppable stack-resolves-until-it's-empty mode we enter.

Instead, we just opt to let the top spell or ability on the stack resolve (via each player passing in succession). When it does resolve, the active player gets priority again, and can either add a new spell or ability to the stack, or can pass it to let others add something new to the stack.

This is actually integral to some abilities functioning properly: if you put two Shocks on the stack targeting my Snapping Sailback, requiring the stack to resolve as a whole would see my Snapping Sailback killed (it dies for having 4 toughness and 4 damage marked on it). But instead it works out like this:

  1. We let the top thing on the stack resolve, which is one of the Shocks. 2 damage is dealt to the Snapping Sailback. (The stack is now just one remaining Shock.)
  2. Someone gets priority. As part of that, we check triggered abilities, and Snapping Sailback's triggered ability goes on the top of the stack. (The stack is now Shock, SS's ability.)
  3. We let the top thing on the stack resolve again: Snapping Sailback's triggered ability resolves, giving it a +1/+1 counter. It's now a 5/5. (The stack is now just one Shock again.)
  4. We let the last thing on the stack resolve: the Shock deals 2 damage to Snapping Sailback. It survives. (The stack is now empty.)
  5. Its ability triggers again and is put on the stack, then we let it resolve, making Snapping Sailback a 6/6.
| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.