# What happens if opponent has infinite turns, but cannot kill me because I have infinite life?

Let's say I have the Heliod, Sun-Crowned + Spike Feeder combo in play, which allows me to gain an arbitrary amount of life at instant speed. Meanwhile, opponent has the Nexus of Fate combo running, which allows her to take arbitrarily many turns. She still needs to convert these turns to a win, though. She is playing Biogenic Ooze as her win condition, but in this case I have arbitrary amounts of life, so Biogenic Ooze is ineffective.

However ... she can continuously make more Oozes and attack for arbitrarily large damage. The board state is changing and so are our life totals, but she cannot kill me, and she cannot pass the turn and win by milling either since eventually I'll draw my Walking Ballista and kill her.

How would the game end?

Related: What happens in the event of a standoff in Magic? However, this doesn't seem like it falls into one of the standoff rules, since it's not a loop. As opponent attacks for ever-larger numbers, I have to respond by gaining ever-larger amounts of life.

• Usually I'd accept an answer, but I don't know which answer is correct, so I'm not going to yet. Feb 15, 2020 at 8:53

Your opponent cannot win, and forestalls losing to Walking Ballista by looping Nexus of Fate. Therefore, you would win the game either by direct judge decision because you explain the inevitable sequence of events, or by the judge forcing your opponent to let you draw cards and eventually getting you to the Walking Ballista.

There is clearly a loop happening. Remember that "game state" is not a defined term. Even gaining and losing life does not alter the game state if it foreseeably does not decide the game at any point, as is the case in your scenario.

Case 3 of the answer to the question you linked does apply. Your opponent can propose a loop with any (finite) number of attacks, and you can counter-propose the same loop, except you first gain enough life to survive all those attacks. Then a significantly different choice has to be made, i.e. your opponent must let you take a turn. You will eventually draw your Walking Ballista and win.

721.3 Sometimes a loop can be fragmented, meaning that each player involved in the loop performs an independent action that results in the same game state being reached multiple times. If that happens, the active player (or, if the active player is not involved in the loop, the first player in turn order who is involved) must then make a different game choice so the loop does not continue.

From the tournament rules:

The judge is the final arbiter of what constitutes a loop. A player may not 'opt-out' of shortcutting a loop, nor may they make irrelevant changes between iterations in an attempt to make it appear as though there is no loop. Once a loop has been shortcut, it may not be restarted until the game has changed in a relevant way. Proposing loops as an effort to use up time on the clock is Stalling.

• I would argue that Case 2 of the linked post applies, both players are taking optional actions to maintain the game state. Feb 13, 2020 at 10:47
• The difference to case 2 is that one player does have a way to win. Imagine the situation as the nexus player having 1 life and nothing else, opponent has nothing but a 1/1 creature and 1 irrelevant card to draw from library. Casting Nexus over and over again would not change the game state, so the Nexus player has to stop casting it and pass the turn. Same with arbitrary life vs arbitrary combat damage, they cancel each other out, and Nexus has to stop being cast. Feb 13, 2020 at 11:33
• @Hackworth Both players have a way to win. And either player has to actively work to stop the other player from killing them. Remember the Nexusing player has loads of gigantic oozes they keep attacking with, each turn. Feb 13, 2020 at 15:40
• Rule 721.3 isn't relevant because it's a multi-turn loop. However, the tournament rules on the judge being the final arbiter is probably the most relevant. The correct answer here is likely that the tournament judge decides.
– Zags
Feb 13, 2020 at 21:25
• It's not clear why you think one player has a way to win, while the other player doesn't... each player can win if the other player stops repeatedly doing an action that prevents it. Feb 14, 2020 at 15:56

It's a draw, as per case 2 in the answer you linked.

You are both actively taking part in hindering the game from progressing. Your opponent by taking new turns, you by gaining enough life to stay alive. From section 4.4 of the tournament rules:

If two or more players are involved in maintaining a loop across turns, each player chooses a number of iterations to perform, or announces their intent to continue indefinitely. If all players choose to continue indefinitely, the game is a draw.

Your opponent had said they will continue taking additional turns to stop you from drawing, you have said you will continue to gain life to stop them from attacking you to death. The actions you both take are optional (in the sense that the game will allow you not to take that choice, although it will lead to losing). In principle, keeping the loop going is an active choice you both have to keep making. This makes the above quote apply, making the game a draw.

If you had had some kind of life-gain machine where you didn't have a say in keeping it going, for instance because it worked off of triggered abilities or replacement abilities (say you had a card that said "prevent all combat damage dealt to you", or "at the beginning of each upkeep, gain X life", where X is enough to keep you alive), then you would win as per case 3 of your linked question.

The answer is that nobody has infinite anything, and you're probably going to lose.

As per the answer you linked, you can run your combo any finite number of times, which you can shortcut by stating that you'll do it some number of times, to which your opponent can either let it run or say how many loops until they intervene. Presumably they have no in-turn interruptions to apply (since their loop happens through their own turn sequence), so they'll let you stop at, for example, gaining one billion life.

After that, you end your turn, and your opponent triggers their own combo. They say that they're going to loop for some number of times (let's say one trillion), at the end of which they now have roughly 1 trillion Ooze tokens, with which they'll attack and overpower your current life total by a factor of 1000.

• OP can say, "whenever you attack with total power X, I make myself gain X life first". OP does not have to accept a shortcut that skips all of their priority until theyre dead. OP really is unkillable. Feb 13, 2020 at 6:23
• Note the lifegain combo is instant speed. The OP can absolutely respond to "I attack with 1 trillion oozes", and do what Hackworth described. Feb 13, 2020 at 10:59