10

When the AlphaGo programs first appeared experts claimed certain moves opened their eyes. Now a couple of years later I wonder what the effect is on go. Has human performance improved, like when chess programs first arrose?

  • 4
    Not really an answer, but you could take a look at senseis.xmp.net/?AIRevolution . In particular, we have learned to invade at 3-3 under 4-4 sooner, and many josekis (local sequences generally regarded as optimal in some global positions) have been improved upon. – PJTraill Aug 31 at 21:08
6

I've read a couple of articles discussing the impact of AI on professional Go, the second one being a reply to the first one:

Some quotes from the first article:

The second important change I see is the professional players’ race to learn from AI. (...) it’s a unanimous belief that you need to play like an AI to win, and every serious player has an AI set up at home. Now, there are both up and down sides to this. The upside is that we sometimes see a player who was somewhat past his prime suddenly climb back to the top, having trained with AI more intensely. There are a growing number of young and new pros who demonstrate surprising strength.

(...) however, pro players have lost the passion or motivation to develop their own styles. Before AI, most strong players had distinctive flavors of play and oftentimes this style was the reason why some Go fans rooted for one player over the other. Today, everyone is trying to imitate the AI style, and the pros judge each other only by who is better at playing like the AI.

The second article refutes the gloomy side of these observations:

While I agree that ai-inspired moves are now increasingly common among top players, I predict that the situation is a bit more like if Ancient Greek mathematicians were given a graphing calculator: of course they will first lose themselves in playing around with the new toy, but eventually they will get used to the new possibilities and life returns to a slightly more normal state. For top professionals, it is valuable to be aware of the newest developments (or ‘meta’) so that one can on the one hand avoid larger mistakes, and on the other save valuable time during tournament games. Besides top games, I suspect the ai has actually made more styles of playing possible.

PS: Bold added for emphasis

| improve this answer | |
  • "and, in fact, some teaching professionals may now find it difficult to even make a living from the game" I am pretty sure this was already the case before AI – Stef Sep 4 at 10:09
  • 1
    @Stef Sorry, I've edited and cut out some quotes because the question was focused in "human performance". But the point in the article is that strong Go players can now learn from IA directly, while amateur players struggle to understand IA proposals, so aspiring professionals have now less need of a teacher or mentor – Pablo Lozano Sep 4 at 10:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.