3

I'm a very inexperienced bridge player (currently in Series 9 on FunBridge) and played a following deal (sorry for posting an image, a PBN version is provided below) using SAYC conventions (all other hands were presumably bots):

Bridge Hand

After West opened in 1 ♠ and both North and East passed, I (South) immediately raised to 3 ♣ showing a strong hand (17 HCP) and strong club suit (6 clubs headed by AKQ), West raised to 3 ♦ and East bid 3 ♥. Now I doubled as a takeout, asking North to show at least any support (after the hand was played, it turned that 4NT was makeable for North-South). Surprisingly, West raised to 4 ♦ which was doubled by North and stood. The contract was played down 4, totaling -1100 points to East-West. (Surprisingly, I was the only player who played in diamonds.)

So, the question is: Why West raised to 4 ♦ having not-so-strong hand and a minimum support from East? Did he try to make a save or preempt?

The hand in PBN format:

[Event ""]
[Site ""]
[Date ""]
[Board "1"]
[West ""]
[North ""]
[East ""]
[South ""]
[Dealer "W"]
[Vulnerable "All"]
[Deal "W:AK962.3.K86543.J 854.KQ87.AQT7.63 7.JT6542.92.T974 QJT3.A9.J.AKQ852"]
[Scoring ""]
[Declarer "W"]
[Contract "4DX"]
[Result "6"]
[BCFlags "1f"]
[Score "EW -1100"]
[Auction "W"]
1S Pass Pass 3C
3D Pass 3H X
4D X AP
[Play "N"]
C6 C4 CQ CJ
C3 C7 CA D3
S4 S7 S3 SA
S5 D2 ST S2
H8 CT CK H3
D7 D9 DJ D4
H7 H2 HA D5
S8 H4 SJ SK
DT H5 C2 D6
HK H6 H9 D8
DA HT C5 DK
HQ HJ C8 S6
DQ C9 SQ S9
6

I expect a lot of this is due to the players not knowing what they, or their opponents, are playing. I don't know if the other players are bots or human, but if bots, the bidding is odd.

The SAYC book doesn't talk about balancing much, but it does say about direct overcalls:

"Overcalls show 8–16 points (double and bid the long suit with a stronger hand)"
"Jump overcalls are preemptive, showing the same value as an opening bid at the same level"

So I don't think anybody understood your 3C bid, and I think that causes a lot of confusion. But you're nowhere near the only one.

I would read this auction (all players playing SAYC):

  • 1S: 11-21, 5+S
  • P: nothing to say (legitimately. You will see some people saying you have to get in here with a double, especially if you can correct 2C by partner to 2D without showing extra strength, a convention known as Equal Length conversion. But it's ugly, and "standard" is pass).
  • P: bad hand (usually < 6 HCP, weaker hands with support may still bid)
  • 3C: not exactly a preempt, in balance, but a "only plays in clubs, trying to freeze out opener". x KTx Ax KQTxxxx or the like.
  • 3D: I have shape, 5=4 or 5=5, and enough extra that I think I can play opposite your horrible hand.
  • P: Still nothing to say. Reading Joe's comment, he's probably right that she should double this, though (for penalty). But it's likely that she thinks you have a real preempt, and the only tricks your side is taking is in her hand, and it's not enough.
  • 3H: Yeah, my hand is worth zero tricks in your suits and two or three in mine, let's hope your hand has tricks for me.
  • X: I don't know what's going on, but this is a misfit and I have tricks. Maybe I'm 1=4=1=7?
  • 4D: I lied to begin with, I'm 5=6 not 5=4, and I'm panicking.
  • X: They aren't making this, partner, someone's finally bid my suit.

Out of the actual bidding with the actual hands, I like North, and, I guess, East.

Why did West open 1S and not 1D? He's bidding on shape not strength, lying about the shape because of the 5-card major is going to cause trouble like this hand. It's also going to lead to 4S with 6D on with a different hand in partner. There's an argument for passing this and hoping to get in with a two-suited bid next round, as well, but if you open, you have to open 1D. Yes, you can get into trouble with an auction where bidding spades shows reverse strength (good 16), but starting with spades causes this problem.

I'm guessing 3D is "hmm, I've totally misdescribed my hand, I need to show my diamond suit." Never mind he knows they have max 15 high and potentially no fit. Sure, you have a good preempt, but your partner has the rest of the cards, and no bid - so probably "my suit".

I don't mind 3H, because she's right - we're in trouble, and it plays a couple tricks better in the weak hand's long suit. She doesn't know that partner has nowhere near the hand he claims to. But I'm not doubled yet; I'd probably pass 3D and see if we can get out for 100 a trick.

Your second double is not takeout - for what suit? They've bid the other three.

4D is pure panic. He knows that he has mis-described his hand to partner and they're in trouble. He should still pass and hope to get out (and he won't).

A more common auction playing SAYC would be:

1D-p-p-X
1S-2H-p-3C
p-3S (looking for stopper)-p-3NT (I have one)
All pass.

There's a lot of ways this could go - West could pass the double; North could think he was too strong for just 2H; South could insist on clubs rather than look for NT (or look for slam, potentially and go past 3NT); in a non-YC game (or by pairs who "play" SAYC, but don't actually know what the book says), East could bid 2H over 1D Weak Jump Shift;...

I might be resulting getting to the only contract that makes, and it is truly unfortunate that 5C, never mind 6, goes down because East's hand is too good.

I expect a lot of minus scores on this hand, some very large ones and some North-South as well. Misfits are always exciting, and very hard to bid, and sometimes get deeper into "nothing makes" territory before people learn to stop. It's a common maxim: "When you know you're in a misfit, pass."

Finally, another of those common maxims is "don't bid your values twice". If you really thought that 3C showed 16 or so and a semi-solid suit, then when 3H comes to you, you have nothing more to show. Pass. Partner with this hand will double 3H for the same 1100 (and somebody will double 3S or 4D if they run); with say xxx Qxx QTxxx xx (giving opener AKxxx Kx AKxxx x, a quite reasonable hand for 1S, then 3D), they'll hope it goes down one and that any plus is a good score.

4
  • I think 3NT is easily achieved in bidding without resulting, and your auction is a good one. I don't agree with 1D at 5-5 with equal or more strength in spades, but that's my preference, it's a common choice with that hand, and definitely simplifies things. I don't think you end up in 5c/6c over 3NT, especially with the clearly one-sided strength on defense and the clear stoppers; it would require either N making a non-pass call on the first go-round or S overselling the strength of their hand; or a failure of cuebidding somewhere. – Joe Oct 7 '20 at 18:13
  • West isn't 5=5, he's 5=6. That's why I don't like 1S (even with AQxxx Kxxxxx). – Mycroft Oct 7 '20 at 21:15
  • Ah, my eyes are failing me apparently. The 5-1-5-1 distribution should've told me something... I like 1d more there, though I still might 1s first given how lousy the diamonds are. But with the low HCP 1d is stronger. – Joe Oct 8 '20 at 0:05
  • Great analysis start to finish. The one tidbit perhaps missed is inferences being made in three other hands that South's 3C call is implying short(er) Spades. it's incorrect, and South gets lucky this time, but helps to explain the other subsequent actions I believe. – Forget I was ever here Oct 8 '20 at 19:57
2

This is a combination of two things: poor bidding and pretty much worst case distribution, which sometimes is just impossible to deal with in a good way.

West's opening is totally fine, of course; 5-5-2-1 distribution and 10 HCP in the long suits is a fine opening bid. North's pass is a little shaky, but at Vul-Vul it's probably okay; NV it seems like an easy takeout double, assuming you play at least that much.

I don't necessarily agree with your 3c, though if that's what you agree that bid means, it's fine. SAYC would probably hold that your bid is correct, to be honest, I just like playing 3c there much weaker, and using the double in that position to indicate such a strong hand (you have basically 7 quick tricks, as you'd usually count them, plus a firm stopper in spades for an 8th trick - you make 3NT with only one trick in partner's hand plus almost anything in clubs other than what actually happens). But in SAYC I think 3c is actually doing what you want - inviting 3NT, which partner should consider bidding, though the lack of spades probably prevents them from doing so; I would probably bid 3S there in North's seat to show the lack of spade stopper. But that's well beyond the capabilities of a SAYC bot, I suspect.

West's 3D rebid is perhaps where things go a little shaky at V-V. 10 HCP in two suits, 5-5-2-1, is tempting to bid there; but it doesn't really accomplish much, other than warning you all about a second risky suit in NT, and maybe giving their partner a second suit to lead if they run out of spades - but they have 0-4 points, and aren't really interested in leading things. The only time that's really going to work out as a bid is if partner has a long diamond suit, and they can play 4DX for less points than 3NT will make; the times that's true AND they can't set 3NT seems ... iffy.

North's pass is one of the worst bids at the table, though it seems to have been helpful in some fashion at least in that it let E-W get in more trouble. I'd want to hear something from North here; depending on your conventions it varies what N is supposed to bid, anything from 3S (invite 3NT with a spade control in s) to X (showing interest and maybe promising diamond control?) to 3H themselves (okay, this is mostly a bad idea, but it might be the only way to invite 3NT with no spade control with limited conventions).

3H by East is pretty bad, also; while it's attempting to find a third suit, West pretty much guaranteed a 2 suiter like they have; East should have more heart length there, and maybe also more heart strength. 6-1 distribution is what East should expect, and on top of that JT-led suit is just not going to play well. Leave it in the 5-2 diamond fit, and maybe get a spade ruff at least in diamonds (as they did).

Your double is definitely not takeout, by the way. You're penalizing them at this point. You've already had the chance to takeout double - on your first call - and didn't. Your initial bid defined your strength and distribution; X here is just whacking them. You're probably fine with the penalty at this point, honestly, though I might just bid 3NT also; but with north staying silent (despite having the second best hand at the table opposite a theoretically strong partner), X is probably the better choice.

4D by West is, again, fighting against partner, and asking for trouble. This is a common problem for newer players; forgetting that bridge bidding is a conversation, and instead deciding they have all of the information and acting based on it. Bad fits lead to this kind of messy bidding. If you find yourself in this situation, maybe make the 3D bid (like I said, still not a great idea vul, but it's not the worst thing here) but then listen when your partner says no to your two suits.


The way this bidding should go, in my mind:

1♠ - p - p - X 2⋄ - X - p - 3⋄ p - 3NT- pass around

First X is a general takeout double showing strong hand. 2⋄ is much easier bid to make for west (and you could argue 3d is better here, being a weak jump shift and more accurately describing the hand, but Vul it's very risky and I think a poor idea.) X for North shows probably 4 hearts and interest in game; many partnerships would allow a 2♥ bid there with four (after the first takeout double).

3⋄ is a "I don't have diamonds covered" bid (a "cue bid") seeking 3NT; this is a very specific agreement though and should be discussed, as with two outstanding suits it could have the opposite meaning. 3♣ would also be okay, and SAYC is probably better, showing that the original X was a stronger bid with a club suit and not hearts. Then N would have to somehow indicate they were okay with diamonds and not with spades, or just take the leap of faith and bid 3NT. (This is why cue bids are important to discuss!)

Either way, this should be fairly standard to get to 3NT, or failing that you might end up in a basically unmakeable 5♣ contract (you ought to lose the first three tricks regardless of the direction, spade-spade-spade ruff).


One note: you use the word "raise" slightly wrong here. You only raise when you bid partner's suit at a higher level. Anything else has another word. Overcall is when you bid over opponent's bid; shift is when you bid a different suit over partner's.

2
  • 1
    Thanks! Yes, it was an overcall, not a raise. English is not my first language so I can use the terms wrong. And the intention of my double over 3D call was "I'm strong, North, please show if you can support me". I thought that 4C rebid was too high since it promises 7+ clubs. – trolley813 Oct 7 '20 at 17:32
  • 1
    Yes, don't rebid 4c; I don't think it promises 7 necessarily, and you have AKQxxx so that's a really good six, but bidding beyond 3NT in the minors is not to be done when you can avoid it, especially if you have the spade stopper as you do. I don't think you should necessarily read the X there asking N for a bid - but it certainly shows strength, and N could bid again of course. But if you want to X for strength, do that at the start. – Joe Oct 7 '20 at 18:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.