I've had this "rule" drilled into me for decades; but somebody asked me recently for an explanation, which I was unable to provide.

  • Select an answer as correct to give out some extra points if you are happy with one of the answer.
    – Styxsksu
    Dec 17, 2020 at 13:49

4 Answers 4


In addition to the other two great answers here, I'll expand a bit more on the "why".

Basically, your goal is to describe your hand as low as possible and as accurately as possible, right? So you want to show partner whether you have 4 hearts or 5 hearts at the earliest moment possible, while showing other details about your hand too.

If you play 2H shows 5, then you have these choices for most hands (in base 2/1) that are game-interested or game-forcing:

1NT: 6-11, nothing else exciting to say
2C:  12+, Hearts 4 or less, Diamonds 4 or less, Spades 3 or less
2D: 12+, 4 or more diamonds, Hearts 4 or less, Spades 3 or less
2H: 12+, Hearts 5 or more

Plus the various "spade support" options, of course.

Now you've told your partner (who's mostly in the drivers seat) what you have without taking up almost any space. Your partner can then tell you their next most interesting thing: whether that is a 4 card heart suit (by bidding 2H), can explore NT, can explore all sorts of things, especially over 1NT or 2C, which are the "least informative" bids. This is a generally good idea in bidding - the higher the bid, the more space is gone, so the more information you need to convey!

2H steals all that space; after that, what can P bid? 2S to show longer spades or maybe if they're stuck, 2NT to decline but not leaving a lot of room to explore NT; or 3 level bids. Ick. If you're going to have to be in a long conversation that might end up with having to really think hard about how safe 3NT is over a 5-2 4S, you want to have that conversation at the 2 level, not the 3 level, as you have only so many chances to show stoppers or shape.

  • Many thanks, Joe, for answering the "why" part of my question. Your response made a lot of sense and was easy to understand. Oct 29, 2020 at 23:06
  • 1
    I think it may be worth emphasizing the most important aspect of your answer: if your partner doesn't have a four-card hearts suit, it's unlikely that hearts would be the best suit, and if your partner does have a four-card heart suit, your partner is likely to bid hearts even if you don't. If your partner has three hearts and six spades, while you have four hearts and two spades, it would be sad to play a 4-3 heart suit when a 6-2 spade suit was available, but if you'd had five hearts, a 5-3 suit would have been better than 6-2.
    – supercat
    Jan 23, 2021 at 21:31

The short answer: because it's just a good idea.

Expanding a bit: One of the primary goals of bidding is to find the best game available. In no trump, game is 9 tricks. In a major suit, it takes 10. In a minor suit, it takes 11 tricks. When you find a good trump fit (8 cards or more in the trump suit), you can usually take about one additional trick with that suit as trumps than you could take in no trumps, and sometimes two.

Thus, when you find that you have a good fit in a major, you look to find game in that major, but when your best fit is in a minor, your first choice is to look for game in no trumps.

When you open five-card majors (almost universal in the United States), you are looking for a 5-3 fit. When partner opens 1S, your first priority is to determine your strength and fit with partner's suit. If you are very weak, you pass.

With a fit: If you have 4 or more spades and game-forcing values, you make the appropriate bid (usually Jacoby 2NT but there are other agreements). If you have minimum responding strength (about 6-9 points) and at least 3 spades, you make a simple raise (2S). If you have invitational strength (about 10-12 points) and 3+ spades, you make a limit raise (usually 3S but there are other common agreements). With game-forcing values and only 3 spades, you generally make a 2-level bid of some sort (see below).

Without a fit: With less than invitational values (Standard American) or less than game-forcing values (2 over 1), you bid 1NT. If you have invitational values or better (Standard American) or game-forcing values (2 over 1), you make the most descriptive bid. If you have five hearts, you bid 2H. Partner now knows you have five hearts and can raise you with 3-card support. Without five hearts, you bid the minor that best describes your hand; some pairs have extensive agreements here, but in my experience most pairs prefer that you bid the cheaper 4-card minor that you hold, and bid clubs if you are 3-3 in the minors unless you have AQJ or better in diamonds.

The worst-case scenario is invitational or better values with 3=4=3=3 shape. As mentioned above, you would tend to bid 2C here unless your diamonds are AQJ or better and your clubs are quite bad. The key thing here is that you don't lose your heart fit. Opener will rebid 2H holding four hearts, which you can raise to the appropriate level.


Because a 3-4-3-3 hand is much more suited to a Notrump than a Heart contract.

A 2H call must perforce deny 4 cards in any of Clubs, Diamonds, or Spades (unless it is a hand believed to be much stronger than Opener's, which lies outside the scope of this Question and Answer), so if holding only 4 Hearts must be the contract killing four-triple-three.

To communicate this type of hand one either responds with 1 or 2 NT, or in the cheapest possible minor suit at the two level.

If partner has 4 Hearts, responding below 2 hearts allows partner to show that second suit without any bidding problems.


It is pretty simple. If partner opens 1S, and you bid anything other than spades, you are saying you have at most 2 spades. If you bid 2H, you are denying 4 clubs or 4 diamonds (otherwise you would have bid 2C or 2D first). So the most clubs and diamonds you have is 3 of each. So this means you have a maximum of 2+3+3=8 spades, clubs and hearts. Therefore, you must have 5 hearts if you bid 2H. It is not so much a rule that you should have 5 hearts, it is mathematically impossible to have less than 5 hearts.

  • This answer fails to demonstrate even a basic understanding of modern (North American at least) Five Card Major bidding styles over an opening of 1 Spade. There are many calls now that show (or infer) support for Spades that are not Spade bids. Today, all of 2NT (Jacoby), 3NT (various), and either 3 (Bergen) or 4 (Splinter) of a minor are likely to be Spade raises. Oct 24, 2021 at 19:14
  • Pieter Geerkens' (“Forget I was ever here”) response to Mike J's answer, which is very logical and easy to understand, in contrast, is demeaning and offensive. Geekens' critique starts by stating that, "This answer fails to demonstrate even a basic understanding of modern (North American at least) Five Card Major bidding styles over an opening of 1 Spade." However, his subsquent verbiage fails miserably to explain that sentence. Nov 14, 2021 at 14:52

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .