I have this past week been learning to play go from the book Learn to Play Go by Janice Kim and Soo-hyun Jeong. In one of the earlier chapters the concept of cutting is brought up and the following problem is posed.
Where can Black play to prevent White from cutting of a stone
$$ ------------------
$$ . . . . . . . .|
$$ . . . . . . . .|
$$ . O X . . . . .|
$$ . O O X . X . .|
$$ . . . . . . . .|
$$ . . . . . . . .|
The most direct answer is
$$ ------------------
$$ . . . . . . . .|
$$ . . . . . . . .|
$$ . O X X . . . .|
$$ . O O X . X . .|
$$ . . . . . . . .|
$$ . . . . . . . .|
But I wonder if there is any merit to consider
$$ ------------------
$$ . . . . . . . .|
$$ . . . . . . . .|
$$ . O X . X . . .|
$$ . O O X . X . .|
$$ . . . . . . . .|
$$ . . . . . . . .|
instead?
My line of reasoning is that if White now tries to cut any of the possible connections which Black can form, then they put themselves in Atari. I am however conflicted about putting a stone there for Black as it removes a possible point for the scoring in the end.