My opponent and myself are at 5 life points. He casts a Fireball of 5 targeting me and I respond with Eye for an Eye so we both take five points of damage. Does my Eye for an Eye resolve first, because it is on stack, thus killing him before the Fireball has a chance to kill me?

If so, does this also apply during the combat damage phase if one of his creatures attacks me thus killing him before his creature has a chance to kill me?

1 Answer 1


You will both lose, meaning the game will be a draw.

Your Eye for an Eye does resolve first, yes, but it doesn’t cause any damage when it resolves. All it does is set up a replacement effect that will happen the next time you would take damage this turn.

So Eye for an Eye resolves, and then Fireball resolves. When Fireball resolves, instead of just you taking 5 damage, you and your opponent both take 5 damage at the same time.

It would work the same if the damage were during combat. Your Eye for and Eye would resolve; setting up the replacement effect. Then when the creature would deal you damage, both you and your opponent take damage at the same time.

104.3b If a player’s life total is 0 or less, that player loses the game the next time a player would receive priority. (This is a state-based action. See rule 704.)

104.4a If all the players remaining in a game lose simultaneously, the game is a draw.

  1. State-Based Actions

704.3. Whenever a player would get priority (see rule 117, “Timing and Priority”), the game checks for any of the listed conditions for state-based actions, then performs all applicable state-based actions simultaneously as a single event.

704.5a If a player has 0 or less life, that player loses the game.

  • Who has priority after fireball resolves?
    – fectin
    Oct 16, 2023 at 18:51
  • @fectin No one in this case... normally, the active player always receives priority after a spell or ability resolves. But here, when the active player is about to priority, state-based actions cause the game to end before priority is given.
    – GendoIkari
    Oct 16, 2023 at 19:01
  • It seems like that would trigger and the active player would lose before the other player has a chance to lose. What causes the inactive player to lose?
    – fectin
    Oct 16, 2023 at 19:24
  • The state-based action applies to all players who are at 0 or less health; not just the player that is about to receive priority. Note that 104.3b doesn't say "the next time that player would receive priority", but "the next a player would receive priority".
    – GendoIkari
    Oct 16, 2023 at 20:48
  • Oh, that makes perfect sense. Thanks!
    – fectin
    Oct 16, 2023 at 20:50

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .