Timeline for Games that have no element of luck.
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 5, 2011 at 13:35 | comment | added | warren | @Scott Mitchell - if you're worried about the apparent advantage white has, then switching colors game to game means the "advantage" is evenly distributed. fwiw, I prefer to play black :) | |
Jan 5, 2011 at 12:32 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki | ||
Jan 4, 2011 at 20:18 | comment | added | Scott Mitchell | @warren: So who is the winner if everytime you play an opponent, whoever is white wins? :-) | |
Jan 4, 2011 at 20:15 | comment | added | warren | @Scott Mitchell - additionally, in most play in which I have participated, colors are alternated between players on successive games | |
Oct 30, 2010 at 4:10 | comment | added | Lance Roberts | @Scott, yes, but that advantage only really comes out at the highest levels. | |
Oct 30, 2010 at 2:07 | comment | added | Scott Mitchell | I agree that chess is pretty close to pure skill, but whoever plays White does have a slight advantage. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-move_advantage_in_chess | |
Oct 29, 2010 at 22:10 | history | answered | Jon Hadley | CC BY-SA 2.5 |