Timeline for Looking for the "magic'al" formula
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2015 at 14:36 | comment | added | Autar | About the Merfolk of the Depths and other obviously overcosted cards we need to remember that not all cards can be good and that bad cards are a necessity (there are several articles on Wizards' website and elsewhere about why). | |
| Dec 14, 2015 at 0:30 | history | edited | murgatroid99♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected "colorless cost" to "generic cost"
|
| Jun 5, 2015 at 17:23 | comment | added | Zags | @ghoppe Cool. There aren't that many examples of efficiently costed red and blue creatures, and almost all of them support your claim about rarer cards being more powerful for the same mana cost. There is also Asphyxiate vs Hero's Downfall, for a comparison of different rarity cards fro the same block. | |
| Jun 5, 2015 at 14:34 | history | edited | ghoppe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 27 characters in body
|
| Jun 5, 2015 at 14:33 | comment | added | ghoppe | @Zags I should have been more clear. I don't think blue and red have 2/2 creatures with a CMC of one colorless and one colored mana. I've edited the post to make this explicit. | |
| Jun 5, 2015 at 0:34 | comment | added | Zags | Red and Blue both have 2/2's for 2 mana with abilities on top. See Kargan Dragonlord, Blood Knight, Lord of Atlantis, and Coralhelm Commander for examples | |
| Jun 1, 2015 at 15:06 | history | edited | ghoppe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Mar 13, 2013 at 8:21 | vote | accept | Nils Munch | ||
| Mar 8, 2013 at 0:09 | comment | added | David Z | Yep, all about playtesting. It may be worth noting that Wizards designs cards years in advance so they have ample time to test their balance. | |
| Mar 6, 2013 at 21:51 | history | answered | ghoppe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |