Timeline for Can people win at Diplomacy using a "Qin strategy?"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2014 at 0:01 | answer | added | user41025 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 15, 2013 at 19:07 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 16, 2013 at 20:37 | |||||
| May 22, 2013 at 1:45 | vote | accept | Tom Au | ||
| May 18, 2013 at 18:10 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackBoardGames/status/335819599654305792 | ||
| May 15, 2013 at 15:42 | answer | added | bwarner | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 15, 2013 at 12:13 | comment | added | Tom Au | @NIck: 4 vs. 3. That's why the Qin won with it. But it is a sophisticated, complicated strategy fraught with pitfalls. Which is why the Qin made a name for themselves when it worked for them. I believe that's how CHINA got its name. | |
| May 15, 2013 at 9:50 | comment | added | Nick | Being on the team of 4 in a 4vs3 certainly sounds like a good plan.. Not sure it deserves its own name though! | |
| May 15, 2013 at 1:45 | answer | added | Forget I was ever here | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 15, 2013 at 0:25 | history | asked | Tom Au | CC BY-SA 3.0 |