Timeline for How much would you revalue your hand after finding a "double fit?"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2023 at 10:00 | answer | added | postrationalist | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 26, 2016 at 20:13 | vote | accept | Tom Au | ||
| Sep 10, 2016 at 15:08 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackBoardGames/status/774625576976019457 | ||
| Sep 9, 2016 at 21:08 | comment | added | Forget I was ever here | @petqwe: Not true - the 2C bid was forcing on opener, so with 4+ Clubs and an unbalanced hand partner is compelled to bid 3C as a non-forcing call. The revealed fit is likely good for both hands, but a return to 3S now by Responder says "I can't do any more, but I do have 3 Spades for you." | |
| Sep 9, 2016 at 3:28 | history | edited | Tom Au | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 223 characters in body
|
| Sep 7, 2016 at 9:41 | history | rollback | Tom Au |
Rollback to Revision 1
|
|
| Sep 7, 2016 at 8:52 | history | edited | Tom Au | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 219 characters in body
|
| Sep 7, 2016 at 8:44 | comment | added | petqwe | And since your 2C is not a game-going bid and partner decides to raise you to 3C voluntarily, you should be going to 4 anyways. | |
| Sep 7, 2016 at 8:21 | comment | added | petqwe | Why did you raise his 2C bid to three with only QJX support? | |
| Sep 7, 2016 at 5:35 | answer | added | Forget I was ever here | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 7, 2016 at 1:45 | history | asked | Tom Au | CC BY-SA 3.0 |