Timeline for In Axis and Allies, Should An Attacker Be Allowed to Relinquish Certain "Prerogatives?"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2011 at 16:55 | vote | accept | Tom Au | ||
| Jun 9, 2011 at 19:55 | comment | added | Tom Au | Is "models" the Norwegian word for "pieces?" Jeg snakke lite Norsk. | |
| Jun 8, 2011 at 21:07 | comment | added | Adam Wuerl | Agree, attacks are simultaneous. Managing dead zones and attacking with only the bare minimum required to capture a territory, but not leaving much to be countered, or attacking with just enough to strafe and damage while retaining the ability to retreat, are key tactical skills fundamental to the game. | |
| Jun 8, 2011 at 19:29 | comment | added | Tom Au | Here's an example of this concept from another context: bleacherreport.com/articles/… | |
| Jun 8, 2011 at 19:17 | comment | added | Tom Au | I was planning to use the infantry as cannon fodder. But Bobby has a point: IF I'm allowed to order the infantry not to fire, I must do so before seeing the results of the heavy weapons attack. Because all the action would in reality be simultaneous. | |
| Jun 8, 2011 at 16:51 | history | answered | LittleBobbyTables - Au Revoir | CC BY-SA 3.0 |