Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 1, 2020 at 2:38 history protected CommunityBot
Mar 2, 2020 at 4:43 history edited Benjamin Cosman CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Mar 2, 2020 at 4:41 comment added Benjamin Cosman The negative comments seem to be on the wrong track. The original question certainly needed some cleaning up, but in it's present form as far as I can tell it is actually a very good question about something which is not covered at all in the rules - see my answer.
S Jan 27, 2018 at 8:22 history suggested SQB CC BY-SA 3.0
Clarified question
Jan 26, 2018 at 23:55 review Suggested edits
S Jan 27, 2018 at 8:22
Nov 13, 2017 at 9:41 comment added Nij I'm okay with questions that can be answered by a rulebook when they require a modicum of interpretation or meta-knowledge or otherwise additional effort. But this is literally reading the text of the rule, monkey-see-monkey-do stuff. Stack Exchange is meant to be the place of enthusiasts and professionals, not a sentient replacement for Google. @tsuma534
Nov 13, 2017 at 9:27 comment added tsuma534 @Nij As far as I know down-voting is the way to go with questions that don't show any research effort. Although trivial, this question appears to be on-topic. And we don't have any policy for closing questions that can be answered by simply reading a rulebook. Not that I wouldn't be happy with one.
Nov 13, 2017 at 8:52 review Close votes
Nov 13, 2017 at 15:44
Nov 13, 2017 at 8:36 comment added Nij I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is beyond trivial, and a fundamental part of the game.
Nov 13, 2017 at 1:29 answer added Benjamin Cosman timeline score: 8
Nov 13, 2017 at 0:08 comment added BJ Myers Did you try looking in the rules?
Nov 13, 2017 at 0:04 review First posts
Nov 13, 2017 at 1:19
Nov 13, 2017 at 0:03 history asked Maddelyn Cook CC BY-SA 3.0