Timeline for How are numerical chess rankings calculated for different ranking systems?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2019 at 12:32 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Apr 22, 2019 at 14:42 | |||||
| Jan 22, 2012 at 20:23 | comment | added | BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft | I suppose that's true of most things, though: going from bad to average is a lot easier than going from 99th-percentile to 99.9th-percentile. | |
| Jan 22, 2012 at 20:21 | comment | added | BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft |
Does the jump between 2000 and 2100 require a lot more practice/improvement than the jump between 1000 and 1100? - From experience: yes. To go from 1000 to 1100, I could teach you about pins/forks, and tell you to do half-an-hour of practice problems a day for a week or two, and that would likely be all you need. To go from 2000 to 2100, however, would require a lot of work in the areas you are weakest (probably studying a lot of endgames and grandmaster-games).
|
|
| Nov 10, 2011 at 0:51 | vote | accept | Gordon Gustafson | ||
| Aug 28, 2011 at 12:34 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackBoardGames/status/107793146515169280 | ||
| Aug 26, 2011 at 17:44 | answer | added | Dave DuPlantis | timeline score: 20 | |
| Aug 25, 2011 at 23:26 | history | asked | Gordon Gustafson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |