Timeline for Is a fifth card in a suit often a decisive factor in three no trump contracts?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2019 at 18:55 | answer | added | John Portwood | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 30, 2019 at 10:52 | comment | added | Forget I was ever here | I get on your case occasionally in regards your algorithms - but here are three sites discussing Barry Crane's Inviolable Partnership Rules: Grant Baze Tribute, Other tributes, Other Rules (in the comments) | |
| Aug 12, 2019 at 0:58 | comment | added | Alexander Woo | Then you know, for any practical purpose, the answer to your question. Count tricks, not points. | |
| Aug 12, 2019 at 0:09 | comment | added | Tom Au | @AlexanderWoo: In this case, I bid a "gambling" 3NT opposite a supposed QJxxxxx and a side honor. I count on 6 diamonds, 2 aces, and a side trick with less than 20 HCPs. My fear is that LHO has something like KQJxx of spades or hearts, plus the ace of diamonds. | |
| Aug 11, 2019 at 21:39 | comment | added | Alexander Woo | Partner opens 3D. You hold S: A62; H: A73; D: K7; C: Q9753. What do you bid? | |
| Aug 11, 2019 at 18:52 | answer | added | Forget I was ever here | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 11, 2019 at 17:05 | history | asked | Tom Au | CC BY-SA 4.0 |