Timeline for What's the strategic advantage of building around alternate win conditions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2012 at 12:06 | comment | added | AndSoYouCode | This answer is great! I agree that not having ways to deal with the deck is the most important benefit. Also having a combo as plan B in you aggro deck gives you a chance to beat that "infinite life deck"/control deck with Moat. Having more than one way to win often gives you more flexibility at the cost of consistency and/or efficiency. The element of surprise is a nice addition too if you have it. | |
| Dec 26, 2011 at 16:22 | history | bounty ended | Alex P | ||
| Dec 26, 2011 at 16:22 | vote | accept | Alex P | ||
| Dec 25, 2011 at 16:36 | comment | added | Alex P | Great answer! About "Fireball Steel": It's a bit trickier than that, IIRC. Tempered Steel was considered weak to Ancient Grudge and Slagstorm. TCF played a flavor that avoided going "all in" as fast as possible in favor of playing cards like Origin Spellbomb to get around Slagstorm. | |
| Dec 24, 2011 at 19:38 | history | answered | thesunneversets | CC BY-SA 3.0 |