Timeline for How does trample interact with damage prevention effects and indestructible blockers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 at 21:57 | history | edited | user1873 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarity, corrected assigned/dealt misused term
|
| May 7, 2012 at 13:50 | history | edited | user1873 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 256 characters in body
|
| May 7, 2012 at 13:40 | history | edited | user1873 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
brevity
|
| May 7, 2012 at 3:26 | comment | added | Circeus | @AlexP thanks... I misunderstood the "Once all those blocking creatures are assigned lethal damage" part and completely missed the "ignore abilities" bit. So I got confused by the nuance of damage assigned vs. dealt. Were it not for that I would have gotten it right. Actually isn't "ignore all abilities that might modify the damage after it is assigned when determining if a blocking creature has been dealt lethal damage" using "dealt" incorrectly? (if I'm reading 510.1c right) | |
| May 7, 2012 at 3:16 | comment | added | Alex P | @Circeus It's the opposite. "You can ignore all abilities that might modify the damage after it is assigned when determining if a blocking creature has been dealt lethal damage, because the rules specifically tell you to ignore abilities and effects that might change the amount of damage after it is assigned." A simplified way to think of it is that the game rules say that prevention effects alter damage as its actually dealt, not when it is assigned. | |
| May 7, 2012 at 2:51 | comment | added | Circeus | And so to answer the three cases as presented (mostly out of curiosity that I read this correctly): no because in none of these cases can the creature assign lethal damage. Right? | |
| May 7, 2012 at 2:00 | history | edited | user1873 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| May 7, 2012 at 1:40 | history | answered | user1873 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |