Timeline for Can we extend the game by playing Multiple Boards At Once?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2016 at 21:00 | answer | added | HyperboreanTom | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 7, 2014 at 13:04 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackBoardGames/status/519473216382058496 | ||
| Oct 6, 2014 at 8:10 | vote | accept | DannyBland | ||
| Oct 2, 2014 at 13:52 | comment | added | Phil Sumner | I can't see that this would work in a satisfactory manner. You're only extending the game by playing what would effectively be two separate games. The only ways I can see to extend the game are to add extra requirements to lay track. e.g. require a loco on top of existing requirements (so for 2 green you would require 2 green + loco), or to treat all track as tunnels (ugh!). | |
| Oct 1, 2014 at 14:38 | answer | added | MegaTom | timeline score: 9 | |
| Sep 30, 2014 at 20:50 | history | edited | Cascabel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 102 characters in body
|
| Sep 30, 2014 at 20:49 | comment | added | Cascabel | @generalcrispy I think it's fairly clear that the OP wants a longer game. I edited to make it a little more explicit, but honestly, it's even in the title. | |
| Sep 30, 2014 at 17:45 | comment | added | generalcrispy | And there's no specific goal. "What's playing with two boards like?" isn't an objective of any kind. This question is subjective at its core. @ConMan is right here. | |
| Sep 30, 2014 at 17:37 | comment | added | Pat Ludwig♦ | I see no reason to close this question. Per house-rules - "Discussion about ways to vary a boardgame are definitely on topic here." and "As with most other subjects, you will get the best answers if you make the question specific. For house rules, this typically means giving a specific goal that you would want to achieve with a house rules." | |
| Sep 30, 2014 at 17:36 | history | edited | Pat Ludwig♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags
|
| S Sep 30, 2014 at 8:08 | history | suggested | shanodin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed 'pre-formatted' which should only be used for code excerpts, replaced with bold to maintain emphasis
|
| Sep 30, 2014 at 6:01 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 30, 2014 at 8:08 | |||||
| Sep 30, 2014 at 0:06 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 30, 2014 at 17:45 | |||||
| Sep 29, 2014 at 23:49 | comment | added | ConMan | I've voted to close, since there doesn't seem to be anything to this question other than "What do you think of this variant?" and I'm not sure that there's any other question that can come from it. | |
| Sep 29, 2014 at 13:12 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 29, 2014 at 18:27 | |||||
| Sep 29, 2014 at 13:11 | history | asked | DannyBland | CC BY-SA 3.0 |