I currently have YuGiOh Duel Generation. Recently, I have noticed that some characters prefer to go first. Why would one do this?

If you go second:

  • You get to attack first
  • You get to draw another card

If you go first:

  • You get a lead in development

Do the benefits of going second outweigh going first, or does development really mean so much?


Well, one reason is because they are computer characters, thus they were programmed that way. But your question goes beyond that.

Obviously, the benefits of going second outweighs going first, or does development really mean so much?

This will depend on the type of deck and strategy you play.

But generally speaking, many decks (specially control or combo decks) prefer to go first, as this gives them a head start in development, as you pointed out. In the current format this is perhaps more favorable compared to one extra card or attacking first turn.

Now days one card is not as big a difference as some years ago; it is now not so greater advantage, as many cards now have abilities to search or special summon.

Also, following a greedy strategy by attacking on first turn may not be such a good idea (by that I mean go all in, not greed as in avarice). As your opponent had lead in development surely some nasty traps or effects await you, thus attacking first is also not such a great advantage anymore.

Another aspect is that some decks "need" to go second/first, as per an intrinsic or key part of their strategy. Say you play a Lava Golem deck, you will need a monster on your Opp side to play your Lava Golem, so going first may not be such a great idea. Or say you play some control deck, or play with Traptrix. In that case you surely want to start to lay out your traps and control mechanisms ASAP.

So, to sum it up: in the current format starting with one card or attacking first is less advantageous than before (now many cards search from deck or special summon), except for those decks whose strategy requires or benefits from going second.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    This is more an answer to "Compare going first to second"; You have not specifically answered my question. – VortexYT Feb 7 '18 at 15:45
  • @VortexYT :0 I even quoted your question, what other one did I miss? The one on the title? That one was also answered in my post, please clarify so I can edit – DarkCygnus Feb 7 '18 at 15:53
  • Don't get me wrong, you did answer it but only partially – VortexYT Feb 7 '18 at 15:57
  • 1
    I've accepted and up voted, but I'm still quite unsure what you have talked about. It isn't as clear as I would like it to be – VortexYT Feb 7 '18 at 16:08
  • 1
    And I apologise about how pedantic I am – VortexYT Feb 7 '18 at 16:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.