2

Yesterday I picked up this in the South hand: 15 HCP, 5 spades headed by Ace Queen, two small Hearts, a Diamond triplet led by the Ace and in clubs the King, Queen, small. This is a pretty standard 1NT opening for us. My partner had 5 hearts and 17 HCP!

We couldn't figure out a clean way of bidding this out: I open 1NT, partner bids 2D for a Jacoby transfer to Hearts, I bid 2H and now partner jumps straight to 6H, leaving no room to check if we have a fit. 6H turns out to be playable, but 6NT is the better contract here.

I later thought of a way to bid this. The auction would be: I open 1NT, partner uses Jacoby 2D to make me bid 2H. Now partner jumps to 6D; this should be an implicit question to bid 6H if I hold at least 3 hearts or 6NT on a doubleton.

Questions

  • Are there any biddings for such a type of hand? Preferably something that fits in our current Jacoby transfers.
  • Any obvious downsides to my proposal for rebidding the transfer at the 6-level?
4

Assuming you are also playing Texas (highly recommended) then the Jacoby Transfer by Responder followed by a jump in the transfer suit always shows exactly 5 card length. This allows partner to jump to 6H, giving you the choice to correct to 6NT with only a doubleton, as you had.

If Partner has 6 card length sufficient to play slam opposite a small doubleton, then partner transfers at the 4-level and jumps to 6H, which is to play.

Don't even think about a 6D jump without serious partnership discussion. Both sides of the table will be wondering if it is telling or asking; and what precisely the subject of the tell/ask is.


Here are some additional agreements for Responder's rebid that are typically employed by partnerships playing both Texas & Jacoby:

  • Texas followed by 4NT = Blackwood (your usual variant)
  • Jacoby followed by 4 NT = Quantitative
  • Jacoby followed by 4C = Gerber
  • Jacoby followed by 4 of the transfer suit = slam interest with a weak 6 card suit
  • Thanks! I didn't know about Texas Transfers. Of course the 6D/6H bids, if we'd decide to do that, would be thoroughly discussed with Partner and be put on the system sheet. – steenbergh Jul 13 '18 at 5:38
  • I think Jacoby followed by 4C is more typically (and better) played as a splinter, showing a 6 card suit, singleton or void in clubs, with slam possible opposite a suitable hand (e.g. one with no values in clubs). After all, if you only needed key card information, there is always texas followed by 4N. – Alexander Woo Jul 24 '18 at 1:03
  • @AlexanderWoo: Yes, that is a more modern treatment. It sacrifices the ability to implicitly suggest to Opener a correction to same level of NT, while a Blackwood auction would then discourage same. A sound partnership will have discussed all these continuations. – Forget I was ever here Jul 24 '18 at 1:11
-2

We've decided on the 6 Diamonds/6 Hearts repeat of the Jacoby Transfer for several reasons:

  • Not having an agreement for this might lead to stopping at 3NT or 4Major, missing Slam, or as happened, put us in the wrong slam.
  • The decision to go for slam should be the responder's choice, and with 6D/H you jump over any game score straight to Slam. Furthermore, if responder is incredibly strong or opener transferred to the 3-level instead of staying at 2 (indicating the maximum NT opening), responder may go to grand slam.
  • The meaning of repeating the Jacoby transfer at the 6-level is very clear; it's not a thing that will happen very often, so when it does it has a certain elegance and clear meaning about it.
  • And with respect to the existing, very educational answer: it saves us from integrating another convention into the mix. My partner and I discussed Texas, and we feel it adds very little to how we play Jacoby right now. The only addition would be this specific case.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.