2

Rule 303.4g deals with an aura that enters the battlefield without a legal choice for what to enchant:

303.4g If an Aura is entering the battlefield and there is no legal object or player for it to enchant, the Aura remains in its current zone, unless that zone is the stack. In that case, the Aura is put into its owner’s graveyard instead of entering the battlefield.

Say you only control 1 creature, which is enchanted Benevolent Blessing, with White as the choice for protection. You cast Replication Technique, targeting Benevolent Blessing. What happens?

The first Benevolent Blessing prevents the creature from being a valid choice for the new one. It sounds at first like 303.4g should apply, but it says that the new aura would remain in its zone... but it wasn’t in any zone ever, it’s a newly created token. So does the token get created at all? I don’t know of a rule other than 303.4g that would stop it from being created.

The other option I can see is that it gets created, and goes to the battlefield not attached to anything. But then it goes away the next time state based actions are checked, as per 704.5m.

This different could matter if you had something that triggered when it enters the battlefield.

I’m using Benevolent Blessing as an example, as it’s the only thing I could think of that would make it possible to have an aura already on the battlefield, while not having a legal choice for another aura that’s a copy of that aura.

1 Answer 1

1

The token is not created.

While a token is not in any zone before it was created, the spirit of 303.4g is that an aura can't enter the battlefield if it has no legal targets to enchant and, if it's currently in any zone, remains in its current zone (except the stack). If such an aura would be a token, rule 111.5 takes effect:

111.5. If a spell or ability would create a token, but a rule or effect states that a permanent with one or more of that token’s characteristics can’t enter the battlefield, the token is not created.

Also note this rule:

303.4i If an effect attempts to put an Aura onto the battlefield attached to an object or player it can’t legally enchant, the Aura remains in its current zone, unless that zone is the stack. In that case, the Aura is put into its owner’s graveyard instead of entering the battlefield. If the Aura is a token, it isn’t created.

The only difference to 303.4g is that it deals with effects that put an aura on the battlefield with a pre-determined attachment target. Arguably, 303.4g missing the last sentence of 303.4i is an oversight.

2
  • I don’t feel like 111.5 is helpful here, because it’s circular... it's saying that if 303.4 prevents it from entering the battlefield, then it doesn’t enter the battlefield. But this is begging the question; it requires an answer to the question about 303 to know whether it applies at all.
    – GendoIkari
    Commented Apr 23, 2021 at 0:51
  • I offer 2 possibilities in my answer: If 303.4g is complete in its wording (and thus does not prevent an aura token creation on its own), I argue it can still be interpreted to say that an aura can't enter the battlefield (as opposed to verbatim "staying in its current zone" which obviously doesn't apply to tokens), which would then require invoking 111.5 to answer your question. If 303.4g is not complete, then it is missing the "If the Aura is a token, it isn’t created." clause from 303.4i, in which case the argument would not require invoking 111.5.
    – Hackworth
    Commented Apr 23, 2021 at 1:25

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .